It is a walking prison.
-DANIEL BACQUELAINE, Belgian MP, on an impending law banning face-covering veils. The law, expected to pass April 22, would make Belgium the first country in Europe to make the wearing of burqa and niqab illegal
So that's what the Belgian MP says about Niqab or covering the face. And as the time.com said Belgium might be the first country to ban wearing it .
First of all, for those who don't know what a niqab or a burqa is . It's the covering of the face except the eyes. And some even cover their whole faces .
In most Arabic countries and all over the world , this is the niqab that most women wear.
In Afghanistan and Pakistan , women wear this kind of niqab or burqa as it came to known world-wide after 9/11
It's a duty for Muslim women to wear decent dresses. Moving from there, the opinion varies between covering the face or not. But all agrees that a woman should cover her body . Except - and that's where they vary- the hands and the face , mostly about face. Walking the streets of any Islamic or Arabic countries you will see different kinds of Hijab and the continuous battle between the right one and the unacceptable one won't end.
Does a Muslim woman have to cover her face?
Sheikh Nâsir al-Mâjid, professor at al-Imâm University in Riyadh Said : -
Observing hijâb is obligatory by the consensus of scholars. It is clearly established by both the Qur’an and Sunnah. However, whether the face must be covered is a legitimate matter of disagreement. The most preferable saying is – and Allah knows best – that the woman should cover all of her body, including her face and hands. Allah says: “And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms” [Sûrah al-Nûr: 31]. `Aishah said: “May Allah bless the first immigrant women, when Allah revealed “that they should draw their veils over their bosoms” they cut some pieces of their clothes and use them as veils. [Sahîh al-Bukhârî] Ibn Hajr writes in Fath al-Bârî:
The word ikhtamarna in the verse means they covered their faces. The clearest evidence for the correctness of this saying is Allah’s saying: “O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters and the believing women that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when out of doors)”. This verse is addressed to the believing women along with the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him). There is no disagreement that the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him) have to cover their faces in front of strangers. Thus, this becomes evidence that other women should do the same as the command for the veil mentions both groups of women together.
Ibn `Abbâs said: “Allah orders the believing women to cover their faces whenever they go out of their houses by something above their heads and to show only one eye.” This is something natural and obvious as the beauty of a woman is most concentrated in her face. Whenever someone says about a woman that she is beautiful, he means the face. The scholars agree that women should cover their hair, neck, arms and everything else besides the face. However, the face is the most important to be covered as it is the part that would cause the most trials. And Allah knows best.
Islamonline.net quoted from the book (The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam) of Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradawi about how a Muslim woman conduct her self with the following:
Her clothing must conform to the standards laid down by the Islamic Shari`ah, which are as follows:
a) Her dress must cover her entire body with the exception of [that which is apparent] (An-Nur 24: 31) which, according to the most preferable interpretation, refers to the face and hands.
b) It must not be transparent, revealing what is underneath it. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) has informed us that, “Among the dwellers of hell are such women as are clothed yet naked, seducing and being seduced. These shall not enter the Garden, nor shall (even) its fragrance reach them.” Here, the meaning of “clothed yet naked” is that their light, thin, transparent garments do not conceal what is underneath. Once some women of Bani Tamim, who were clad in transparent clothes, came to see `A’ishah, and she remarked, “If you are Believers, these are not the clothes which befit believing women.” On another occasion, when a bride wearing a sheer and transparent head-covering was brought into her presence, she commented, “A woman who dresses like this does not believe in surat an-Nur.” (This is surah 24, which together with surah 33 (al-Ahzab) contains many injunctions concerning purity and propriety, man-woman relations, and dress.)
c) Her dress must not be too tight so as to define the parts of her body, especially its curves, even though it may not be transparent. This describes many of the styles of clothing current in the sensuous, materialistic civilization of the Western world, whose fashion designers compete with one another in devising clothing for women which tantalizingly emphasizes the bustline, waist, and hips, etc., in order to elicit the lustful admiration of men. Women who wear such clothes likewise fall under the definition of “clothed yet naked”, since such a dress is often more provocative than one which is transparent.
d) She must not wear clothes which are specifically for men, such as trousers in our time. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) cursed women who try to resemble men and men who resemble women, and prohibited women from wearing men’s clothing and vice-versa.
e) In her choice of clothing she should not imitate non-Muslims, whether they are Jews, Christians, or pagans, for Islam disapproves of conformity to non-Islamic modes and desires its followers to develop their own distinctive characteristics in appearance, as well as in beliefs and attitudes. This is why Muslims have been asked to be different from non-Muslims in many aspects, and why the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) has said, “Whoever imitates a people is one of them.”
So you can see there are differences between the scholars of the Muslim world about Hijab, but they all agree that it's the covering of the hair and modest dress for the whole body.
Since 9/11 , the whole world seems to be interesting about the states of the Muslim women in the Arabic and Islamic worlds . A very few care before that .
The first way of liberating women was to get rid of her Hijab but mostly to get her rid of her niqab and burqa , specially since the west enemy back then- the Taliban- force women to wear the burqa and force them to do nothing but to sit at home with no work.
And then the hit came from where liberty resides in the west. And in the name of secularism and freedom , countries started to attack Niqab and burqa leaving the normal Hijab alone, except in some countries.
They have stated many reasons for this
but most of them claimed that wearing the Niqab or Burqa is against the secularism of the country by banning all religious symbols.
And the rallies didn't stop
First it was in some places in France, and now probably Belgium.
But I wonder why didn't the South American countries go after the Niqab ? how about the non-Muslim African and Asian countries? . Though it is attacked in some Arabic countries.
Why is it the industrial west. And why didn't America go after it, too ?
That's a fascinating survey!
BalasHapusI'm uncomfortable with the idea of the veil (in the broadest sense) being used to shroud the whole person. But I'm equally uncomfortable with the idea of (male) politicians legislating as to who should be 'freed' in this way.
I think France and Belgian and similar European countries have a tradition of legislating freedoms in this way. In the US, constitutional rights would actually mitigate against this, I suspect.
dad, that's the whole point. even if we are not comfortable with it, it doesn not mean we should free people of it, because of us.
BalasHapusThere are certain conditions in the U.S. where covering the face is not acceptable, such when one is having a picture taken for a driver's license. There was case in Florida, maybe a year or so ago, where the court decided that irrespective of one's religious beliefs, the covering of the face was illegal when it came to the issue of a photo ID, such as a drivers license.
BalasHapusI think that was the correct decision. I don't agree with what France and Belgium would be doing, banning the niqab, as it starts a slippery slope. While I am an atheist, I do believe in the freedom of religious expression.
Everything is double standard in Western Countries and some Muslim counties. If the government doesn't feel comfy with it, there's a big chance it will be looked down upon.
BalasHapusI view it as "not obligatory" it should be a choice. I have so much to say about this and will insha'a'Allah come back when I have time. Great post!
P.S. Your font is fine!
I enjoyed this post. I found it interesting to read the argument that the face is most beautiful and should, therefore, be for sure covered. Um, what's wrong with something being beautiful? I've seen handsome men, beautiful women, children and even animals. Isn't this a wonderful attribute of our Creator that He created beauty? And so what? women are beautiful therefore they of all creatures should hide themselves?
BalasHapusI'm all for modesty. I believe many in the West show too much, however, I think the character of a person is shown often in her face and eyes. I enjoy seeing people smile and seeing their eyes twinkle at a joke or glitter with rage when angered.
And I saw from the picture that natural beauty is best therefore no makeup and no tweezing the eyebrows? That's interesting because I see scores of Muslim women pictured with beautifully made up eyes and faces.
Furthermore if men lowered their gazes, why would women have to cover their faces? I guess it's because all men aren't Muslims and the nonMuslim men might gaze upon a woman's face, right? Then why are women in Muslim countries complaining MORE than in Western countries about men harassing them? It seems it should be the opposite since Western women show more skin and more nonMuslims exist in those countries. You'd think the Muslim countries with their covered women and lower-their-gazes men would have the MOST respect for women and there be nary a catcall or harassment unless it was one of those nonMuslim residents doing it.
And I really hope the men who make such rules don't go around gazing at all of the beauty of the nonMuslim women whether in person while riding the bus with them, shopping near them or watching them on TV or in movies.
Thanks for opening up discussion on this topic. It's an interesting one for sure!
Mr. Nighttime,
BalasHapusthat what should happen in cases of having an id or a driver license, because it makes no sense taking an identifying picture while covering the face.
living in any place where the rules are different than what your religion might say, someone need to follow this rule and that. But to take the whole rights to follow someone's religion, is absurd.
Texan, that's why i keep saying that there are no Muslim countries despite what some countries like to call themselves.
BalasHapusThank you dear and waiting for your come back with more :)
Susanne,
BalasHapusin almost every aspect of Islam , there are different arguments. Back then, it was a very active community with so much tolerance, which is not the case nowadays unfortunately.
Those who believe that the face must be covered, they based their arguments on the idea that the face is the most beautiful part and it's
the source of temptation which might lead to wrong path.
I believe that temptation can be through different ways and not only the face. But again that's their arguments.
Tweezing the eyebrow? that's another topics.Do you know that A LOT believe that this is also forbidden in Islam.
But even men are asked to lower their gazes and not to look which is leading to the second opinion,-you can not gaze unless someone is showing their face- so if they are asked to lower their gazes , does not that mean that women are not asked to cover their faces !!!
As for harassing , it's mostly because of the culture of not mixing or mingling between men and women and so on. And sadly because it's the lack of basic knowledge of respect for women.
Lots of people believe that if you are not covered or that you show your face or hair or parts of your body then you are asking for the attention of everyone therefore anyone can say or sometimes even do something to you and you can not complain. And there are no exact law against harassing. Sometimes even the victim of a rape is compared and put in the same level of the rapist.
It's a sad thing and nothing Islamic about it, btw.
You are welcome dear and as always i appreciate your comments :)
There is one well-known Muslim woman writer I like, her name is Mona (can't remember her last name) ... she argues vehemently against the niqab. She used to wear hijab herself ... and her sister still does as well as her mom.
BalasHapusI think that if a woman wants to wear it, she should. But I don't believe in any case anyone should be forcing her to wear certain things. Of course, there is social pressure, so no one is ever free to wear whatever they want without any consequences. And in many cases there is considerable family pressure to dress a certain way.
And that goes for any society ... not just Muslim ones.
I can see the argument that a face is beautiful, so it should be covered. But, in my thinking why should a woman have to cover herself totally and be uncomfortable, not able to enjoy any bit of sun or wind.
I think a solution would be for men to wear very dark glasses so they can't see any women clearly, hahaha. :D
Aynur,
BalasHapusThat's Mona althawi, i guess.
And i agree with you, if a certain woman wants to wear it, then she can go ahead with and there should not be any law against that except for taking pictures for the id or driver license and such things.
I still believe that the way we dress is mostly cultral than religous. Culture and tradions do interfer a lot with such things. And if one can be free from that and still wants to wear it, then they should be grant that.
lol@the dark glasses.they will have a fatwa against it then, lol
there are only practicing, partially-practicing or non-practicing muslim to me as opposed to the label extreme, moderate or liberal some people like to use...
BalasHapusit is true there are different rulings with regards to how muslim, men and women, should dress but the basic rules don't differ...all should know which ruling they follow, that's most important...
i have always wanted to see more girls and women who wear niqab and hijab out of personal choice come forward and tell their stories...
as much as i am against women being oppressed by whatever reason i am also against women being represented wrongly (like they wear niqab and hijab out of oppression whereas in reality they do it out of personal choice)...
...and yes i have met few ladies who told me they wore hijab out of personal choice...
....and no i don't wear niqab or hijab...but i see nothing wrong with those who do when they do it out of personal choice...
essalam alaikum wa rahamtullahi wa barakatuh,
BalasHapusyou have a nice blog here sister, masha'allah.
i live in algeria, but am american. recently the algerian government has began to implement a law that will forbid hijab or niqab in passport photos, local id photos or school id photos. this is a "muslim country" and they won't allow the sisters to cover.... how sad..
Good post
BalasHapusSuraya,
BalasHapuswell said . i can not add anything to your words. it's describing it all in a direct and honest words.
Thank you :)
Jennifer,
BalasHapusw'3alikum alsalam .
Thanks for your lovely words dear :)
i can understand a western countries doing that but as you said a "Muslim and Arabic country " doing it, is not acceptable . so the law in Algeria is it already a law or are they still arguing about it ?
seasonsali.
BalasHapusThank you :)